Creative Commons License


"defense" spending action theory action-based jurisprudence actions altcoins American history Amsterdam anarchy antifragile Arthur C. Clarke audio YouTube Australia Austrian school Ayn Rand banking Bitcoin Bitcoin Bitstamp block size debate blockchain books bubble bureaucratic budgets business cycles Carl Menger civilization climate change collectivism commodity community Constitution deflation deflationary spiral demonetization digital signatures dualism duality economic cycles Economic history Economic theory economic theory economic voting economics Economics and society education encryption Energy entrepreneurship environment ethics evolution Evolutionary health exchange rates fantasy fasting fear and media ffiat money fiat money Fiction Films flow Francis Pouliot game of thrones gaming Gary Taubes Gavin Andresen Gaza Gedauges global warming gold gold standard Hans-Hermann Hoppe Happiness hashing Health Henry Hazlitt history Hugo Award winners hyperinflation hypermonetization ideology iintegral theory individual rights individualism inflation inherent value insulin integral theory intermittent fasting Isaac AsimovFri Jane McGonigal Jason Fung Jeff Volek Jeffrey Tucker Jörg Guido Hülsmann journalism JP Koning jurispurdence justice Katrina ketosis law LCHF legal theory legal theory lipid profiles litecoin Low carb Ludwig von Mises Mark Sisson Matt Ridley media metabolic syndrom Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi Military mining Mises monetary theory monetization money Mt. Gox Murray Rothbard Nassim Nicholas Taleb Nebula Award winners network effect Nina Teicholz Nolan Chart Nutrition obesity Objectivism open-source Paleo paradox Peter Šurda Philipp Bagus philosophy police policy drivers policy objectives policy success Political philosophy political power political spectrum political voting Politics politics politics and science praxeology prcing Prices & Markets pricing Primal propaganda property rights property theory psychology Randy Barnett redistribution of wealth reductionism regression theorem remittances reputation research Reviews Reviews revolution Rick Valkvinge rivalry Roderick T. Long Ron Paul Rothbard Satoshi Nakamoto satoshis scarcity science science fiction silver singularity state state and education state/business partnership statefree statistics Stephan Kinsella supreme court theocracy Training Biochemistry transaction malleability US history value voluntaryism Voting

Who was it that lived at the corner of Tech and Humanities?

I've seen a comedic poster of Steve Jobs and Dennis Ritchie, both computer industry giants who passed away recently, circulating on the web. The poster is labelled to show that Jobs was "praised by the media as Jesus of computing," while Ritchie, who was instrumental in developing the C programming language and UNIX was "ignored."

The problem with this is that developing technology and envisioning end products that reach users where they live are entirely different functions. "Raw" invention and successful execution in business are entirely different functions.

Jobs made a habit of looking at existing, emerging, and even dormant ("gorilla glass") technologies and then imagining what normal people could do with them when no one else saw it, not engineers and not consumers. He explicitly defined his work not as technology development, per se, but as bridging large gaps at the "intersection of technology and humanities." This is detailed as a central life theme in the recent biography of Jobs by Walter Isaacson.

The kind of comparison in this photo may rightly promote Ritchie as a technologist, but as a snub against Jobs, it badly misses the point. It reveals a kind of engineering arrogance, the view that what "really" counts is the technocrat and his technologists, but not the marketer, the merchandiser, the designer, the visionary, the distributor, or the strategist. As it turns out, all of these functions "really" count and can do no useful work in isolation from the others. Real markets (and the real world) require much more than technology; in the end, they require its application to the "end" business of living.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
« REVIEW | Focused progress with Body by Science, but integration with proper running methods should be possible | Main | On more robust theoretical foundations for legal philosophy »